A famous man named Elon Musk agreed with another person who said that Siri, a talking helper on iPhones, is not very good. This happened after Apple's boss, Tim Cook, said they have some exciting new things coming soon for AI (the smart stuff that helps computers and phones think). People are waiting to see if Apple can make Siri better and more useful. Read from source...

1. The article starts with a quote from Elon Musk that is irrelevant to the topic of Siri and Apple AI developments. It seems like an attempt to grab attention and credibility by associating with a famous tech entrepreneur, but it does not add any value or insight to the discussion.
2. The article presents MKBHD's post as a contrast between his optimism about Apple's future AI moves and his dissatisfaction with Siri's performance. However, this is a false dilemma, since one can be both hopeful for Apple's AI potential and critical of its current state. The article does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support MKBHD's claims, nor does it acknowledge the possible limitations or challenges of developing AI solutions.
3. The article mentions Billy Markus, the co-creator of Dogecoin, as a source of criticism for Siri. This is an irrelevant and weak authority, since his expertise in AI is not established or explained, and his fame is based on a joke cryptocurrency that has no connection to Apple's products or services.
4. The article implies that Tim Cook is "very bullish" about Apple's AI capabilities, but does not provide any quotation, source, or details to back this up. This is an empty assertion that does not support the main argument of the article, which is that Siri is underwhelming and needs a major overhaul.
5. The article reports on Apple's plans to unveil Siri 2.0 and other AI-based tools at WWDC, but does not analyze or evaluate their impact, feasibility, or novelty. It simply states this as a fact, without questioning the assumptions or expectations behind it. The article also uses vague and exaggerated terms like "transformative", "challenge its rivals head-on", and "significant leap" to create a positive spin on Apple's AI strategy, but does not provide any evidence or reasoning to justify these claims.