Adobe is a big company that makes computer programs for making art and photos look nice. They want to make a new tool that can turn words into videos. To do this, they need lots of videos showing different things people do and how they feel. So, they are asking people who use their programs to send them videos and will give them money for it. This way, Adobe can learn from the videos and create better tools for making art and photos. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there is a high cost associated with training generative AI with videos, but the article does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. Instead, it focuses on Adobe's efforts to acquire more video data for its text-to-video project.
2. The article compares Adobe's initiative with OpenAI's Sora, which is a different type of technology that converts text into images rather than videos. This comparison is not relevant or accurate, as the two projects have different goals and outputs.
3. The article mentions the monetary incentive of $120 for video submissions, but does not provide any context or details on how this compares to other similar initiatives or the market value of such data. It also does not discuss the potential ethical implications of paying people for their personal expressions and emotions.
4. The article praises Adobe's commitment to integrating generative AI capabilities across its creative tools, but does not provide any examples or evidence of how this will benefit users or improve their workflow. It also does not address the possible challenges or risks associated with using such technology in creative applications.