Okay kiddo, let me explain this to you. So there's this thing called Shopify, which is a company that helps people sell stuff online. Sometimes, big people who have lots of money want to buy or sell parts of this company, and they do it using something called options. Options are like bets on what the price of the company will do in the future. Today, we found out that some very rich people made big bets on Shopify using options. Some of them think the price will go down, and some of them think it will go up. We don't know who they are or why they did it, but sometimes when these big bets happen, something interesting happens to the company later. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that only "market whales" (wealthy investors) are interested in SHOP options, while the average retail trader should care about their bets. This creates a sense of exclusivity and curiosity, but also lacks substance and evidence.
- The article relies heavily on unverified claims and rumors, such as "somebody knows something is about to happen". There is no analysis or explanation of what this "something" could be, how it would affect SHOP's performance, or why it should matter to the readers. This is a classic example of fear-mongering and speculation, rather than informative journalism.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms, such as "bullish", "bearish", "uncommon", and "special". These words do not convey any clear or specific meaning, but rather create a sense of mystery and uncertainty. They also make it impossible to verify the claims made by the author, or to compare them with other sources of information.
- The article does not provide any data or evidence to support its main assertions. It simply reports on what the options history shows, without explaining how it was obtained, how it was interpreted, or how it relates to SHOP's fundamentals, valuation, or outlook. This is a serious lack of due diligence and journalistic integrity, as well as an opportunity for manipulation and misinformation.