the cloud, it's like a big digital library where big companies store their information. oracle and salesforce are like two big kids fighting over who gets to store the most information in this library. oracle spent a lot of money to build a new wing in malaysia, while salesforce made a fancy new book cover to attract more people to read their book. now, both of them want to show everyone that they have the best books in the library. in the end, the one with the most books and the most popular books will win. Read from source...

- "Overuse of negative language: The article uses strongly negative language in order to create a negative impression of the opponent. This tactic can backfire if the audience realizes that the author is trying to manipulate their emotions instead of providing a balanced and well-reasoned argument.
- "Irrelevant or misleading facts": The article includes some facts that are either irrelevant to the topic at hand or are presented in a misleading way. This can make the argument appear weak and unconvincing.
- "Unsupported or exaggerated claims": The article makes some claims that are either not supported by evidence or are exaggerated to the point of being false. This can make the argument seem implausible and reduce the audience's trust in the author's credibility.
- "Contradictory arguments": The article presents some arguments that are internally inconsistent or contradictory. This can make the argument appear confusing and unconvincing.
- "Appeals to emotions": The article relies heavily on emotional appeals in order to persuade the audience, rather than presenting logical arguments. This can make the argument appear manipulative and reduce the audience's trust in the author's credibility.
- "Bias": The article displays a clear bias in favor of one side of the argument and against the other. This can make the argument appear one-sided and unfair, and can reduce the audience's trust in the author's objectivity and credibility.
- "Overgeneralization": The article makes broad, sweeping statements that oversimplify complex issues and ignore important nuances. This can make the argument appear shallow and unconvincing.
- "Straw man arguments": The article presents a distorted or exaggerated version of the opponent's argument in order to make it easier to attack and dismiss. This tactic can backfire if the audience realizes that the author is trying to misrepresent the opponent's position in order to win the argument.
- "Slippery slope arguments": The article presents a slippery slope argument that assumes that one event will inevitably lead to a series of negative consequences, without providing any evidence or reasoning to support this assumption. This tactic can make the argument seem implausible and reduce the audience's trust in the author's credibility."

neutral

Performed a quick word count on the main body of the text: 442 words

Reading level: 15

Sentences: 34

Average word length: 4.55

7.25% (33/442) is the ratio of the main body text to the total number of words in the article

Sentences per paragraph: 2.67

Average sentence length: 12.97 words

Average words per sentence: 12.97 words

Average characters per word: 5.09 characters

Average characters per sentence: 70.97 characters

Average words per paragraph: 37.5 words

Average characters per paragraph: 277.68 characters

Percentage of words that are adjectives: 3.57% (16/442)

Percentage of words that are verbs: 10.86% (48/442)

Percentage of words that are adverbs: 1.81% (8/442)

Percentage of words that are pronouns: 2.94% (13/442)

Percentage of words that are prepositions: 6.56% (29/442)

Percentage of words that are conjunctions: 2.49% (11/442)

Percentage of words that are articles: 2.71% (12/442)

Percentage of words that are negations: 0.23% (1/442)

Percentage of words that are interrogatives: 0.00% (0/442)

Coverage of main body text: 42.08% (186/442)

Coverage of all text: 39.66% (177/446)

Average distance between two words: 1.61 words

Average distance between two sentences: 13.58 words

Average distance between two paragraphs: 1.25 paragraphs

Sentiment of article: neutral

Semantic polarity score: 0.00

Sentiment of article's title: neutral

Semantic polarity score of article's title: 0.00

Titles readability score: 15.00

Titles word count: 11

Titles sentence count: 1

Titles