Okay, so this article is talking about Netflix, which is a company that lets people watch movies and TV shows on their phones, tablets, computers or TVs. People can pay a monthly fee to access lots of different shows and movies. Some people who work with money and stocks like to buy something called "options" for Netflix, which is a way to make more money if the company does well, but also lose money if it doesn't do well. The article says that some experts think Netflix will be worth $700 per share soon. They also say that there are people who are buying and selling these options a lot, which means they think something big might happen with Netflix soon. If you want to know more about what these people are doing with their money, you can use a website called Benzinga Pro, which will tell you when someone buys or sells an option for Netflix. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the options market can reveal some hidden or secret information about Netflix that would otherwise be unavailable to investors. This is not true, as options are a form of financial derivative that reflects the underlying asset's price movements, but also involves additional factors such as time decay, volatility, and interest rates. The options market can provide some indications of the traders' expectations and sentiment, but it cannot tell us anything about Netflix's fundamentals, business model, or future prospects. Therefore, a more accurate and informative title would be something like "What the Options Market Tells Us About Traders' Expectations and Sentiment for Netflix".
2. The article body is too long and detailed, focusing on irrelevant and confusing technical aspects of options trading that most readers will not understand or care about. For example, the section titled "Netflix 30-Day Option Volume & Interest Snapshot" contains a lot of numerical data that does not explain how to interpret it or what it means for Netflix's performance. The same goes for the section on analyst ratings, which is based on subjective opinions and assumptions that may not reflect the true value of Netflix as a company. A better approach would be to summarize the main points and implications of these data in a concise and clear way, using simple language and examples.
3. The article tone is too positive and optimistic about Netflix's future outlook, without acknowledging any potential challenges or risks that may affect its growth or profitability. For example, the article does not mention any of the following issues: the increasing competition from other streaming services, the rising content costs, the regulatory uncertainties in different markets, the customer churn rate, the impact of the pandemic on consumer behavior and preferences, etc. A more balanced and realistic tone would be to present both the strengths and weaknesses of Netflix as a business, and how they may influence its options trading activity.

Based on the information provided in the article, it seems that Netflix is currently a dominant player in the streaming service market, with over 250 million subscribers globally. The company has avoided live programming or sports content, focusing instead on on-demand access to television shows, movies, and documentaries. This strategy appears to be working well for the firm, as it continues to attract a large number of customers and maintain its position as the leading streaming service provider.