Apple is a big company that makes phones, computers and other gadgets. They were trying to make a car too, but it was very hard and they decided to stop. Now they will work on making something else with AI, which is like a smart helper. Some people who worked on the car project might lose their jobs or have to change what they do. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that Apple's decision was based on some objective analysis by Wedbush's AI Ives. However, the article does not provide any evidence or reasoning behind his claim that this was "the right move" for Apple. It also suggests that the alternative option of continuing with the EV project would have been an uphill battle, without explaining what challenges or obstacles Apple would have faced in that scenario.
- The article relies heavily on quotes from Wedbush's AI Ives and other analysts, who are not named or cited for their credentials or track record. This creates a false impression of consensus or authority among experts, without verifying the credibility or validity of their opinions. It also ignores any opposing views or alternative perspectives on Apple's decision to abandon the EV project, which could have been presented by other analysts, industry insiders, or investors who disagree with Ives' assessment.
- The article uses emotional language and framing to evoke a positive reaction from readers, such as "abandon", "scrapped", "faced numerous setbacks", etc. These words imply that Apple's decision was a failure or a loss, rather than a strategic move or a change of direction. They also overlook any potential benefits or opportunities that could have resulted from continuing with the EV project, such as innovation, competitiveness, market share, or social impact.
- The article fails to provide adequate context or background information about Apple's EV project and its history, goals, achievements, and challenges. It also does not explain how the project fits into Apple's overall strategy, vision, or values, or how it relates to other trends or developments in the automotive industry or the broader technology sector. By omitting these details, the article makes it difficult for readers to understand the significance or rationale of Apple's decision, and to evaluate its implications or consequences for the company and its stakeholders.