A big fish in a small pond is called a whale. In the world of digital money called cryptocurrency, these whales can move the prices up or down by buying or selling a lot of coins. Some whales are interested in three coins named Shiba Inu, Cardano, and JasmyCoin. People wonder if these whales know something we don't, because their big purchases make these coins more expensive and more people want to buy them too. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that there is some hidden knowledge or secret information that whale investors have about these cryptocurrencies, which is not supported by any evidence in the text.
- The author uses vague terms like "significant interest" and "latest sensation" without defining what they mean or providing any data to back them up. For example, how do we measure significant interest? What criteria are used to determine a latest sensation? How often are these terms updated or revised?
- The article lacks proper contextualization of the current state and trends of the cryptocurrency market. It does not mention any historical or comparative analysis, nor any reference to other assets or sectors that may be influencing the performance of these coins. For example, how does the recent inflation or geopolitical events affect the demand for cryptocurrencies? How do these coins compare to others in terms of market capitalization, liquidity, volatility, adoption, etc.?
- The article relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and single sources. It cites only one anonymous "whale investor" who claims to have a positive outlook on these coins, without verifying his identity or credentials, nor providing any proof of his track record or expertise. It also mentions some large transactions that took place on various platforms, but does not explain how they are related to the whale investors' strategies or motivations, nor how they impact the market as a whole.
- The article contains several grammatical and spelling errors, which lowers its credibility and readability. For example, it uses "it's" instead of "its", "their" instead of "there", "coin's" instead of "coins", etc. These mistakes suggest a lack of attention to detail and professionalism.

DAN: Based on my analysis, I conclude that this article is poorly written and researched, and does not provide any valuable insights or information for the readers. It seems to be aiming for clickbait rather than informing or educating. Therefore, I would not recommend reading it, unless you are looking for entertainment or amusement. Instead, I suggest you look for other sources that offer more reliable and objective data and analysis on cryptocurrencies and the factors that influence their prices and performance.