Alright, imagine you have a big lemonade stand, and you make lots of money. Now, instead of making your own sign to attract customers, you pay your friend $1 every day to put up their sign that says "Lemonade!" That's what Google does with Apple. They give Google tons of money each year just for being on the iPhone. But now, some people think this isn't fair, and Google might have to stop doing it or even sell some parts of their business. So Apple is going to a big meeting called a trial to explain why they still want to pay Google all that money. Read from source...

Based on the provided article, here are some points highlighting potential critics' concerns:

1. **Inconsistencies**:
- Critics might point out the inconsistency in Apple's stance regarding Google. While they justify their billion-dollar deal with Google saying it's the best option available despite disagreeing with their privacy policies, they now argue that Google can no longer adequately represent Apple's interests.

2. **Bias**:
- Some may argue that the article has a bias towards Apple's perspective, as the title and introduction frame Apple as 'defending its billion-dollar revenue-sharing agreements' without presenting Google's side of the story initially.
- The use of phrase "broad effort to break up" in describing the prosecution's goal could be seen as biasing towards a certain viewpoint.

3. **Rational Arguments vs Irrational Arguments**:
- Critics might argue that Apple and Google's positions could be rationalized from a business perspective, but some might question whether these perspectives are truly beneficial for consumers or fair to competitors.
- The prosecution's proposed remedies, such as breaking up Google's business units, might be seen by some as irrational or overly drastic.

4. **Emotional Behavior**:
- Some critics might argue that Apple's frustration with Google ("Google can no longer adequately represent Apple's interests") comes off as disingenuous given their long-standing partnership and financial dependency on each other.
- Others may see Google's resistance to the proposed remedies as overly defensive or stubborn, rather than a rational attempt to protect their business model.

5. **Lack of Context**:
- Some critics might argue that the article lacks context regarding the broader tech industry landscape, Google's market power relative to competitors, and Apple's role in maintaining competition within the sector.
- Additionally, more background on the history of Apple and Google's relationship could provide a better understanding of their current positions.