A man named Kevin Svenson, who knows a lot about bitcoin, thinks that the price of bitcoin will go up and down a lot in the next few weeks. He believes it could reach $90,000, which is much higher than its current price of $67,974. But he does not know if this will be the highest price ever or if it will keep going up after that. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and exaggerated. It implies that Bitcoin is facing a wild ride with unprecedented volatility, but it does not provide any evidence or analysis to support this claim.
- The analyst quoted in the article, Kevin Svenson, uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "Base 4", "parabolic curve pattern", and "trend line". He does not explain what these concepts mean or how they are derived from historical data or market dynamics. He also makes predictions that are based on speculation and conjecture rather than empirical evidence or sound reasoning.
- The article fails to mention any of the potential risks, challenges, or drawbacks of investing in Bitcoin, such as regulatory uncertainties, security issues, price manipulations, or competition from other cryptocurrencies. It also does not provide any balanced perspectives or counterarguments from experts who have different views on the future of Bitcoin and the crypto market.
- The article has a strong bias towards optimism and enthusiasm for Bitcoin and its price potential, which may appeal to some readers who are looking for positive reinforcement or validation of their own beliefs. However, it also ignores or downplays the realities and complexities of the crypto market, which may mislead or disappoint other readers who are seeking accurate and objective information or advice.
- The article uses emotional language and rhetorical devices to elicit strong reactions from the audience, such as "could hit $90,000", "going to be a lot of volatility", "culmination of the bull market", "break the parabolic trend". These phrases are meant to create excitement, curiosity, or fear in the readers, but they do not contribute to the quality or credibility of the article.