A big company called Google made a smart helper named Gemini. But people were not happy because they showed it too early and it looked bad. Now, another smart helper named Claude 3 from a different company called Anthropic might be better than Gemini and could help Google win against their rival OpenAI's GPT-4. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Google-backed AI model will help Sundar Pichai achieve something he couldn't do before, which is to beat OpenAI's GPT-4. However, the article does not provide any evidence or comparison between Claude 3 and GPT-4, nor does it explain how Gemini's image mess affected Google's AI development.
2. The article claims that Claude 3 is a strong contender in the AI space, but it does not elaborate on what makes it superior to other AI models, such as ChatGPT or GPT-4. It also does not mention any use cases or applications of Claude 3, nor does it provide any data or metrics to support its claim.
3. The article blames Google for staging its AI video demonstration and rushing the product's launch, leading to Gemini's image mess. However, it does not provide any sources or details on how Google's actions caused this problem, nor does it acknowledge any other factors that might have contributed to Gemini's image issues. It also does not explain how Claude 3 is different from Gemini in terms of quality, reliability, or safety.
4. The article uses emotional language and tone, such as "beat", "reshaping", "backdrop", and "culprit". These words imply a sense of competition, urgency, and conflict between Google and OpenAI, which might appeal to some readers' emotions but do not add any value or credibility to the article.
5. The article ends with a promotion for Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage, which is irrelevant and off-topic to the main story. It also uses a photo from Shutterstock, which does not match the content or theme of the article.