This article is about a new update for Apple Watches called watchOS 10.3. It makes Siri, the voice helper, better at using health information and lets you change how your watch looks with a simple swipe. This comes after Apple stopped selling two of their watch models in the U.S. because of a legal problem with another company. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and clickbait-like. It suggests that watchOS 10.3 brings back a "beloved swipe gesture" for changing watch faces, but it actually does not mention what this gesture is or how it works. A more accurate and informative title would be something like: "watchOS 10.3 Update Adds Improvements to Siri and Health Data Access, as Well as Minor Changes to Swipe Gestures".
2. The article starts with a vague and generic statement about watchOS 10.3 being more powerful than its predecessor. It does not provide any specific or measurable evidence of how it is more powerful, nor does it compare it to other smartwatches or operating systems in terms of performance or functionality. A better opening would be something like: "Apple has released a new update for its watchOS, bringing several enhancements and bug fixes to its smartwatch platform".
3. The article then proceeds to describe the features that were added or improved in watchOS 10.2, but does not explain how they relate to watchOS 10.3. This creates confusion and redundancy for the reader, who might think that these are new features when they are actually old ones. A clearer way of presenting this information would be something like: "In the previous update, watchOS 10.2, Apple introduced some integration and user interface enhancements, as well as Siri access to health data. However, it also reinstated a swipe gesture that allowed users to change watch faces more easily".
4. The article mentions a sales pause for two of Apple's watch models in the U.S. market, but does not provide any context or explanation for why this happened or how it affects Apple's reputation or performance. It also introduces irrelevant and unrelated information about Masimo Corporation and its patent lawsuit against Apple, which has nothing to do with watchOS 10.3 or its features. A more appropriate way of addressing this issue would be something like: "Recently, Apple faced some legal challenges from medical technology company Masimo Corporation, which claimed that Apple infringed on its patents for blood measurement sensors. As a result, Apple temporarily halted sales of two of its watch models in the U.S., but this decision does not affect the performance or functionality of watchOS 10.3".
5. The article ends with a quote from leading equity analysts who praise Apple's products and services, but does not cite any sources or data to support their opinions. It also uses vague and subjective terms like "beloved", "smooth", and "matter" without defining them or providing any evidence for them. A more credible and objective way