People are having fewer babies now because it is expensive and hard to have a family. They also want to focus on work or travel instead of kids. This means there will be fewer people in the future, which can affect how businesses grow and how markets do. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that falling birth rates will drive markets lower, without providing any solid evidence or causal link. A better title would be "Baby Bust: Will Falling Global Birth Rates Affect Economic And Social Trends?".
- The article cites James Pomeroy, a global economist at HSBC Global Research, as an authority on the topic, without mentioning his qualifications, background, or potential conflicts of interest. This creates a false impression of credibility and objectivity. A more transparent approach would be to include his academic credentials, affiliations, and any relevant disclosures.
- The article relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, such as the personal stories of young people who are delaying or forgoing having children, without providing any statistical or empirical data to support their claims. This makes the article more subjective and emotional, rather than objective and rational. A more rigorous approach would be to use surveys, databases, or studies that measure birth rates, fertility preferences, and demographic trends across countries and regions.
- The article assumes that falling birth rates are a negative outcome for markets and economies, without considering the possible benefits or opportunities they might create. For example, the article does not discuss how lower population growth could reduce pressure on resources, environment, and public services, or how it could open up new sectors, industries, and innovations that cater to an aging population. A more balanced approach would be to weigh the costs and benefits of different scenarios, and consider alternative perspectives and solutions.