Alright, imagine you have a special watch just like the one in the stories about Apple. This watch is really great at counting your steps and knowing if you're running or walking fast.

But sometimes, people might want to wear it on their ankle instead of their wrist, because maybe they're doing something where wearing it on their wrist would be uncomfortable. Or perhaps they just think it looks cool there!

The story is saying that some people are doing this, but the watch was made to work best when it's on your wrist. So, even though it might still work a little bit if you wear it on your ankle, it won't be as good at counting your steps or knowing what kind of exercise you're doing.

It's like when you have a special pair of shoes for running that work really well, but then you decide to wear them on your hands instead. They might still protect your hands a little bit, but they won't do the best job because they were made to protect your feet while you run! Read from source...

Based on the provided text from a news article discussing Apple Inc. and the trend of using Apple Watches in unusual ways (like wearing them on ankles or wrists), here's a AI (Detecting Argumentation fallacies) analysis highlighting potential issues:

1. **Hasty Generalization** - The text suggests that people wearing Apple Watches on their ankles are "trying too hard" and it's "getting out of hand." This is a hasty generalization as it makes assumptions about the motives and intentions of all such individuals based on a few examples.

2. **Ad Hominem** - The author mentions, "Some people have even gone so far as to wear them on their ankles." The use of "even" in this context can come off as mocking or dismissive of these choices, rather than focusing on the main point (e.g., the versatility and practicality of wearable technology).

3. **Emotional Language** - Descriptions like "the Apple Watch craze is getting out of hand" appeal to emotion by employing exaggerated language instead of presenting a factual argument.

4. **Biased Lexicon** - The use of terms like "obsessed" and "crazy" may indicate bias, as they are pejorative and carry negative connotations, implying that the behavior being discussed is irrational or unhealthy.

5. **Strawman Argument** - The author argues against people who "try too hard to show off their wealth," but this isn't necessarily applicable to everyone wearing Apple Watches in unconventional ways. They may have practical reasons (e.g., tracking activity, answering calls, viewing notifications).

6. **No Counterargument** - While the text presents concerns about this trend, it doesn't engage with or address potential counterarguments, such as: "How is wearing an Apple Watch on your ankle any different from attaching an iPhone to a lanyard?" or "What are the benefits of wearable technology in terms of convenience and health tracking?"

These issues suggest that the article could benefit from a more balanced presentation of facts and arguments, addressing counterarguments, and avoiding emotive language.

The sentiment of the given article is mostly **neutral** with some slight inclinations towards:

- **Positive**: The article discusses the growth and adoption of the Apple Watch, suggesting that it's a popular product.
- "growing in popularity"
- "sending more frequent alerts than ever"

- **Negative/Bearish**: There are mentions of misunderstandings and potential confusion caused by these frequent alerts.
- "causing some misunderstanding"
- "leaving users confused about the urgency of certain alerts"