Alright, imagine you have a special kind of plant that grows in some states. Some people use this plant to feel better or to help with their health problems, but other people think it's not safe and don't want anyone using it.

Right now, the big rules makers (the government) say this plant is against the rules, like saying you can't play in the playground after lunchtime. So, shops that sell this special plant and people who grow it, need to follow secret rules and hide a bit so they don't get into trouble.

But some grown-ups are trying to change these rules. They want the plant to be allowed everywhere, just like playing on the playground any time you want. These grown-ups think it's safe and helpful for many people.

The news is saying that soon, the big rules makers might give a new rule: instead of saying "no" to the special plant, they'll say "maybe" or "okay, but with these safety rules." This means shops and growers won't have to hid as much, and more people can use the plant if they want.

So, it's like waiting for your teacher to change a rule so you can play on the playground again without feeling scared of getting in trouble. Read from source...

As a text-based AI model, I don't have the capability to write articles or create stories. However, I can help you analyze and criticize an existing piece of writing based on certain aspects such as consistency, biases, rational arguments, or emotional undertones. Please provide me with the text or article you'd like me to critique, and let me know which aspect(s) you're particularly interested in analyzing.

Based on the provided text, which announces an upcoming event related to cannabis rescheduling and does not contain any specific financial information or market analysis, the sentiment of the article can be classified as:

- **Neutral**: The article neither expresses a optimistic nor pessimistic view about the cannabis industry. It merely presents factual information about an upcoming event.

Here are some reasons for this classification:
1. No explicit positive (e.g., "opportunity," "growth," "progress") or negative (e.g., "challenge," "slump," "setback") language is used.
2. The article does not make any predictions or conclusions about the cannabis industry's future prospects.
3. It is purely informational, aiming to notify readers about an upcoming event related to the cannabis industry.

Therefore, without additional context or analysis, a neutral sentiment best describes this article.