A big court decided that Apple cannot bring into the U.S. some of its watches that can measure blood oxygen because another company, Masimo Corp, has a special patent on this technology and Apple is using it without permission. The White House could have stopped the ban but they did not. Now, Apple wants to change their watch design so they don't break the rules anymore, but for now, they still can't bring those watches into the U.S. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized, implying that the ban is reinstated on all Apple Watches with blood oxygen sensors, while in reality, it only affects specific models that violate Masimo Corp's patents.
2. The article fails to mention that Apple has been granted a 60-day window to import and sell the affected models before the ban takes effect, which shows a lack of understanding of the legal process and timeline involved in such cases.
3. The article uses emotive language and phrases like "shut down", "violation", "removed" and "infringing", which convey a negative tone and imply a sense of urgency and wrongdoing, without providing any context or balance to the situation.
4. The article does not mention that Apple has already redesigned its blood oxygen sensors to avoid patent infringement, as reported by other sources, such as CNBC. This omission suggests a lack of research and relevance to the current state of affairs regarding the product and the lawsuit.
5. The article does not explore any potential benefits or implications of the blood oxygen sensors for consumers' health and wellness, nor does it acknowledge Masimo Corp's interests or motivations in pursuing the patent dispute, which creates a biased and one-sided narrative.

Negative

Summary:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that Apple cannot import Apple Watches with blood oxygen technology while the company appeals a ban issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission related to two health technology patents held by Masimo Corp. The ban was initially imposed after the White House declined to overturn it in December. Apple had offered to redesign its product to avoid potential patent infringement, but this led only to a temporary pause of the ban before the court's final decision to reinstate it.