A study found that because marijuana is not legal in some places, people might use a different product called delta 8 THC instead. This can be AIgerous and the government needs to pay attention to it. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and exaggerated, implying that prohibition directly causes unregulated weed use, while the study only shows a correlation between delta 8 THC use and states without medical or adult-use cannabis laws, not causation. A more accurate title would be "Delta 8 THC Use Is Higher in States Without Medical or Adult-Use Cannabis Laws".
2. The article fails to provide any evidence or data on the actual prevalence and harms of delta 8 THC use, such as adverse effects, abuse potential, or public health impacts. This leaves readers with an incomplete and potentially biased understanding of the issue.
3. The article cites a federally funded study published in JAMA, but does not mention any details about the study's methodology, sample size, limitations, or conclusions. This creates a lack of transparency and credibility for the source material.
4. The article mentions that delta 8 THC synthesized from hemp is a glaring multi-billion dollar market, but does not explore any reasons why consumers might prefer it over other forms of cannabinoids or how the industry operates in the legal gray area. This leaves out important context and background information for readers interested in the topic.
5. The article ends with a quote from one of the researchers that suggests prohibition may unintentionally promote delta 8 THC use, but does not provide any analysis or discussion on how this could be addressed or what implications it has for policy or regulation. This leaves readers without any guidance or solutions to the issue.