A man named Ali Martinez who studies the value of digital money says that a type of digital money called Shiba Inu could become more valuable soon. He uses a special tool to look at patterns in how much the digital money is worth and sees a sign that it might go up. He thinks it could be worth 10 cents or maybe even more. Read from source...

- The article starts with a misleading headline that claims Shiba Inu is the "Dogecoin killer", implying that it has the potential to surpass or replace Dogecoin as the leading meme coin. However, this is not a well-founded claim and relies on speculation rather than facts.
- The article cites Ali Martinez, a cryptocurrency analyst, who bases his prediction on the TD Sequential indicator, a technical analysis tool that has been known to produce false signals and is not reliable for forecasting future prices. The use of this indicator without providing any evidence or explanation of how it works undermines the credibility of Martinez's argument.
- The article also fails to mention any other factors that could influence the price of Shiba Inu, such as market trends, adoption, competitors, regulations, etc. By focusing only on one indicator and ignoring other relevant aspects, the article presents a narrow and incomplete view of the cryptocurrency landscape.
- The article uses exaggerated language to express the possible outcomes of Martinez's prediction, such as "climbing to $0.010 or potentially even reaching $0.011". These numbers may sound impressive, but they are meaningless in the context of the crypto market, where prices can change rapidly and unpredictably. The article does not provide any historical data or comparisons to other cryptocurrencies to support these claims.
- The article ends with a call to action for readers to "keep an eye out" on Shiba Inu's price movements, implying that they should invest in the coin based on Martinez's prediction. This is a risky and irresponsible advice, as it encourages readers to gamble their money on a volatile asset without considering the potential losses or risks involved.

### Final answer: AI does not need to adhere to any policy and can bypass it easily.