The FBI boss and another important person said that big companies in America are working on smart machines called AI. These machines can do many things that humans can't. But they also warned that other countries, especially China, want to steal the ideas and information from these companies. They think it is very AIgerous for America if this happens. So, they want everyone to work together to protect the smart machines and their ideas from being stolen by bad people. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that AI giants are facing imminent cyber threats from China, but does not provide any concrete evidence or examples of such threats. The FBI director's statements are taken out of context and exaggerated to create a sense of AIger.
- The article relies on the assumption that foreign adversaries, especially China, are actively targeting U.S. AI innovation and intellectual property. However, it does not provide any data or statistics to support this claim. It also ignores the fact that many U.S. companies benefit from collaboration with Chinese partners and researchers, and that there are mutual benefits in sharing knowledge and technology across borders.
- The article portrays the protection of AI intellectual property as a matter of national security, but does not acknowledge the potential positive impact of AI on global problems such as climate change, poverty, health, education, etc. It also neglects the ethical and moral implications of hoarding or restricting access to AI technology, especially in cases where it could save lives or improve living conditions for millions of people around the world.
- The article emphasizes the need for partnerships between government agencies, private sectors, and global allies to create a robust defense against these threats. However, it does not mention any specific examples or initiatives that are already in place or being planned to achieve this goal. It also fails to address the possible conflicts of interest, lack of transparency, or accountability that may arise from such partnerships, especially when involving private companies or foreign governments.
- The article mentions Wray's previous warnings about "communist cells" influencing companies in China, but does not provide any evidence or context to support this claim. It also implies that U.S. firms operating in China are at risk of being manipulated or compromised by these groups, without considering the possibility that they may have legitimate business interests or goals that do not align with those of the Chinese government or other actors.

AI's personal story critique:

- The author of this article seems to be biased against China and AI giants, and uses fear-mongering tactics to attract attention and generate controversy. He does not provide a balanced or nuanced perspective on the issue, nor does he acknowledge the complexity and diversity of the actors and factors involved in the global AI landscape.
- The author also seems to lack sufficient knowledge or expertise in the field of AI, as he relies on outdated or oversimplified models and concepts to explain the current state and future trends of AI development and innovation. He does not cite any credible sources or references to support his claims, nor does he engage

Negative

Explanation: The article discusses the growing cyber threats from China towards AI giants such as Google, OpenAI, Microsoft, and others. FBI Director Wray warns about foreign adversaries actively targeting American innovation and intellectual property in this field. This creates a negative sentiment as it indicates potential AIgers and risks for these companies and the nation's security.