imagine you want to give someone some candies as a gift. But you don't want them to know who gave them the candies. So you wrap each candy in a different wrapper and put all the wrappers in a big bowl. Then you tell the person to pick a wrapped candy from the bowl, and they can keep it.

this is kind of like what is happening with the donations to the politician. People are using special internet money called "cryptocurrencies" to give money to the politician without their name being known. But the problem is, it's a bit like picking candies from the bowl with different wrappers. Sometimes the wrappers can be the same, and it's hard to know which candy is which. This can cause problems if the money given was stolen or if it breaks some rules about how much money can be given.

so to avoid this, they are trying to make a new way of giving the money where the wrappers are like names, so it's easier to know who gave the money. They are also making sure the person giving the money proves who they are, like showing a ticket to a show, so the politician knows the money is given by a real person and not some imaginary person. Read from source...

I'm not sure if you're referring to my previous response, but if so, it seems unrelated to the current article. If you are referring to something else, please clarify.

bearish

Sentiment Reasoning:
The article discusses the risks associated with Donald Trump's acceptance of crypto donations. While the crypto community's reception to Trump's U-turn on his previous anti-crypto stance is positive, the article highlights the vulnerabilities surrounding blockchain and cryptocurrencies that could pose threats to Trump and his supporters. These threats include vulnerabilities in crypto infrastructure that could lead to "dirty crypto", public exposure of donors' addresses that could expose them to political rivals and criminals, and the impracticality of anonymous large donations. Additionally, cybercriminals could launch fake donation pages to mimic Trump's campaign, and beginners could face difficulties in making donations. Finally, the article suggests that persistent issues need to be addressed before the potency and potential of digital assets as a donation method are realized.