A person who helps people invest money (an analyst) has lowered his prediction of how much a company called Lucid Group will be worth. He used to think it would be worth $6, but now he thinks it will only be worth $3. This is because the company is facing some problems with making deals and selling enough cars. Even though Lucid makes really good electric cars that work better than many other car companies, including Tesla, they still have to compete with a lot of other car makers and find ways to make people want to buy their cars. Read from source...

1. The analyst's rating and forecast change seems arbitrary and based on subjective factors rather than objective data or market trends. He lowers the target price from $6 to $3 without providing any solid evidence or reasoning for such a drastic drop. This could indicate a lack of confidence in his own analysis or an attempt to manipulate the stock price by creating fear among investors.
2. The licensing discussions with major OEMs are portrayed as reactive rather than proactive, implying that Lucid is not taking the initiative to secure deals and is merely responding to inquiries from potential partners. This could be a sign of weakness or lack of strategy on the part of Lucid's management.
3. The Aston Martin deal is dismissed as a supplier deal, not a licensing deal, which seems an irrelevant distinction given that any partnership with a major automaker would likely involve some form of collaboration and exchange of technology or resources. This could reflect a bias against Lucid's capabilities or potential to succeed in the industry.
4. The analyst reduces both the cars per share value and the licensing per share value, citing lower probabilities of higher penetration levels, without providing any data or analysis to support this claim. He also does not acknowledge any positive developments or achievements by Lucid that could increase its attractiveness to OEMs or customers.
5. The article focuses on the challenges and uncertainties facing Lucid, such as seAI demand and licensing discussions, while downplaying or ignoring its strengths and advantages, such as its superior technology and efficiency compared to Tesla and other competitors. This could indicate a negative bias or an attempt to undermine the company's credibility and potential.

1. RBC Capital Markets maintains a Sector Perform rating on Lucid Group, Inc., lowering the forecast to $3 from $6.
2. The analyst cites licensing concerns and lowered probabilities of deals as reasons for the downgrade.
3. Lucid's efficient tech compared to Tesla's, but challenges remain with seAI demand and licensing discussions.