A person named Adam Jonas from Morgan Stanley likes Tesla as a company that makes electric cars. He thinks Tesla will do well in the future because it can store energy and make self-driving cars better. But he also says that the stock price of Tesla might go up and down a lot for some time, so people should be careful when buying or selling it. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and clickbaity. It implies that the author feels more optimistic about energy storage than other aspects of Tesla, such as robotaxis or FSD V12. However, the body of the text does not support this claim. The author merely reports on Morgan Stanley's analyst Adam Jonas and his reiteration of a positive outlook for Tesla in general, without expressing any personal opinion or preference.
2. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "increased earnings pressure", "transition from an auto company to an AI and robotics company", and "heightened volatility". These terms do not provide any specific or measurable indicators of Tesla's performance, challenges, or opportunities. They also imply a negative tone and bias against Tesla, as if it is struggling or facing some kind of crisis.
3. The article cites only one source, Morgan Stanley's analyst Adam Jonas, who has a vested interest in promoting Tesla's stock price and attracting investors to his firm. There is no mention of any other experts, researchers, or stakeholders who might have different perspectives or insights on Tesla's energy storage, robotaxis, or FSD V12 projects. The article does not provide any critical analysis or evaluation of Jonas's claims or assumptions.
4. The article focuses mainly on Tesla's full self-driving (FSD) software and its achievement of one billion miles driven by its users. However, this is a relatively minor and insignificant milestone compared to the other challenges and opportunities that Tesla faces in terms of energy storage, robotaxis, AI and robotics, and other competitive markets. The article does not explain how or why FSD software is relevant or important for Tesla's long-term success or growth. It also ignores the potential ethical, social, and legal implications of using such software on public roads.
5. The article ends with a speculative statement about Tesla's future performance in terms of driving miles per year and day by 2030. This statement is not supported by any evidence or data, and it seems to be based on a wild guess or wishful thinking. It also implies that the author has no understanding or appreciation of the technical, operational, and financial challenges that Tesla might face in achieving such ambitious goals.