A person who is really good at guessing how much money companies can make or lose (called an analyst) says that Uber, a company that helps people get rides, will do better than expected. The article also talks about other companies this analyst thinks are doing well and not so well. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the analyst has a proven track record of success and accuracy, but it does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. It also suggests that the reader will learn about five stock picks from the most accurate analysts on Wall Street, but only one analyst is mentioned in the article, which creates confusion and disappointment for the readers who expect more insights and recommendations.
- The article does not provide any context or background information about the analyst, his firm, or his methodology. It does not explain how he calculates his accuracy rate, what criteria he uses to select his stocks, or how he evaluates their performance. This makes it hard for the readers to trust and verify his claims and opinions.
- The article focuses too much on the recent news and events related to the selected stocks, rather than analyzing their fundamentals, valuation, growth prospects, and risks. It also does not compare the analyst's picks with other similar or competing stocks in the same sector or industry. This makes it difficult for the readers to assess whether the analyst's views are reasonable, consistent, and objective, or if he is biased, influenced by external factors, or following a trend.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms such as "upside", "downside", "soft guidance", "upbeat results" without defining them or providing any data or analysis to support them. It also does not indicate how the analyst's price targets are derived, what assumptions they are based on, or how they change over time. This makes it impossible for the readers to understand the rationale behind the analyst's ratings and recommendations, or to compare them with other sources of information or analysis.