A big boss of a computer company, Marc Benioff, said that some other computer companies are using stories and articles from newspapers and magazines without asking permission. He thinks this is not fair and these companies should pay the people who write those stories. Another big boss, Sam Altman, says his company tries to use the stories in a good way and follows the rules. They also say that some things they use for their computer programs are not very important. Read from source...

- Benioff accuses AI companies of stealing media content for technology development without permission, but does not provide any evidence or examples of such theft. He also ignores the fact that AI companies have already negotiated with some media giants for content licensing and are trying to find legal ways to use news content.
- The article implies that OpenAI is using copyrighted materials from Time, NY Times, Fox Corp, etc., without mentioning that these materials are often available under Creative Commons or fair use licenses, which allow limited use for educational, research, and other purposes. It also fails to acknowledge the benefits of AI technologies for journalism, such as summarization, fact-checking, and content recommendation.
- Benioff's claim that training data is overvalued and that Salesforce has a "trust layer" in its AI software is vague and unsubstantiated. He does not explain how he measures the value of training data or what makes his AI software trustworthy compared to other AI solutions.
- Benioff's concerns about AI's risks to democracy are exaggerated and unfounded. He does not provide any specific examples or evidence of how AI could interfere with elections, influence public opinion, or undermine the integrity of the media. He also does not address the potential positive impacts of AI on journalism, such as enhancing transparency, accountability, and diversity of sources and perspectives.
- The article lacks a balanced perspective and objective analysis of the issues raised by Benioff and Altman. It presents Benioff's views as factual and authoritative, while dismissing or ignoring Altman's counterarguments and explanations. It also does not include any independent sources or expert opinions to support or challenge either side of the debate.