A big company in America wants to stop another app called TikTok from being used there because it is owned by a Chinese company. This could help some other big companies that have similar apps, like Meta and Snap. But, stopping TikTok might be too risky and complicated for the American government. Read from source...

1. The author uses anecdotal evidence and insider opinions to support his claims about the consequences of a TikTok ban for major tech companies like Meta and Snap. Anecdotal evidence is not reliable or valid because it relies on personal experiences or opinions, which can be influenced by bias or emotions. Insider opinions are also subjective and may not reflect the overall market sentiment or trends.
2. The author does not provide any data or statistics to back up his claims about the potential benefits of a TikTok ban for other social media giants. Data-driven analysis is essential for making informed decisions, especially in the context of stocks and investments. Without concrete evidence, the reader cannot assess the credibility or accuracy of the author's arguments.
3. The author uses emotional language and phrases like "playing a little with fire," "watershed moment," and "uncertain future" to create a sense of urgency and fear among the readers. Emotional appeals can be manipulative and misleading, as they do not address the actual facts or logic behind the situation. The author should focus on providing objective and rational information instead of trying to evoke emotions in the reader.