A man named Gene Munster, who knows a lot about Apple and technology, thinks that Apple will make a big change in how its devices work at an event called WWDC. This change is related to AI, which means computers can learn and think by themselves. He says this is the biggest change since the 1980s when Apple made the first computer with pictures and buttons on the screen. Read from source...

1. The article starts with a sensationalist headline that claims Tim Cook's AI focus at WWDC will be the "biggest change in Apple's operating system design" since the 1980s. This is an exaggeration and an oversimplification of the potential impact of AI on Apple's software ecosystem. The article does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim, nor does it acknowledge the possible limitations or challenges of implementing AI across various platforms and devices.
2. The article relies heavily on the opinions and predictions of Gene Munster, a former analyst at Piper Sandler who now works for Deepwater Asset Management. Munster is known for being bullish on Apple and its products, but his track record is not flawless. He has made wrong or premature calls in the past, such as predicting that Apple would release a television product by 2016, which never happened. The article does not present any other perspectives or sources of information to balance Munster's view or provide a more nuanced understanding of the topic.
3. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "AI" and "GUI" without defining them or explaining how they relate to each other. This makes it difficult for readers who are not familiar with these concepts to follow along and appreciate the significance of the alleged change in Apple's operating system design. The article also does not provide any historical context or comparisons with other tech companies or products that have incorporated AI features in their software or hardware.
4. The article ends with a promotional note for Benzinga Tech Trends newsletter, which seems out of place and irrelevant to the main topic. This could be seen as an attempt to generate more clicks and revenue from the readers, rather than serving them with useful and informative content.
5. The article lacks any critical analysis or evaluation of Apple's AI strategy, its competitive advantages, its ethical and social implications, or its potential impact on consumers and investors. It simply regurgitates the hype and speculation surrounding the upcoming WWDC event, without providing any original insights or value-added information.