Alright, imagine you had some pocket money, let's say $1,000. A smart man named Jensen Huang said a long time ago that something called "cryptocurrency" was going to be very important. He thought people would use it a lot because it makes sending money from one person to another really easy and cheap.

So, if you listened to him and used your $1,000 to buy something called Bitcoin (which is like the most famous cryptocurrency), you could have bought about 0.139 of these Bitcoins back then.

Now, many years later, Bitcoin has become much more popular and valuable. Today, one whole Bitcoin costs over $96,550! This means that those 0.139 Bitcoins you bought would now be worth over $13,474!

So, by listening to Mr. Huang and buying Bitcoin when it was cheaper, you could have made a lot of money. That's what we call a "good investment" or a "staggering return on investment," which means you got back much more than you put in.

But remember, the world of technology moves really fast. When Mr. Huang was talking about Bitcoin, people used special computers called "GPUs" to find new Bitcoins (something called "mining"). But now, people use even stronger and faster computers called "ASICs" for mining instead.

And that's how this story goes! It's like when you buy a cool toy that everyone wants later on, and you can sell it for more money than you paid. Just with computers and money instead of toys! Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some aspects that could be critiqued or reviewed:

1. **Inconsistencies**:
- The article mentions that GPUs were eventually superseded by ASICs for crypto mining, but then Huang's comments in 2018 about cryptocurrencies driving GPU demand are presented as if they're still relevant in the present day.
- The title states that Huang expected blockchains to be "the fundamental new form of computing," while the article later mentions that he only expected them to become an important driver for Nvidia's GPUs.

2. **Bias**:
- The article presents Huang's positive remarks about cryptocurrency without mentioning any potential drawbacks or risks associated with it.
- There's no mention of Nvidia's involvement in controversy around GPU shortages and price hikes amidst the crypto mining boom, which could be seen as a conflict of interest.

3. **Irrational Arguments/Perspectives**:
- The article doesn't provide much context or analysis about why Huang made these remarks at the time, or whether they still hold true today.
- It presents a staggering return on investment (1,247%) without acknowledging that such high returns often come with high risks.
- There's no comparison with traditional investments to put the crypto returns into perspective.

4. **Emotional Behavior**:
- While not exactly "emotional behavior," the article uses language like "staggering" and "swiftly" which can evoke strong emotions and make readers react rather than think critically about the information presented.

To improve the article, it could benefit from:

- Providing more context and analysis around Huang's remarks.
- Mentioning both the potential benefits and risks of investing in cryptocurrency.
- Including different perspectives on crypto mining and its impact on GPU demand.
- Comparing crypto returns with traditional investments to provide a balanced view.

Based on the provided article, the sentiment is **bullish** and **positive**. Here's why:

1. The article celebrates a significant return on investment (ROI) from investing in Bitcoin based on Huang's earlier remarks.
2. It highlights Huang's optimistic view of cryptocurrencies and blockchains, which proved to be prescient given the astronomical rise in Bitcoin's price and the broader growth of the crypto market.
3. The use of phrases like "staggering return" and "Bet on cryptocurrencies" further emphasizes the bullish sentiment.

There are no negative or bearish aspects mentioned in the article to counter this positive tone.