Nvidia and other tech stocks made the Nasdaq 100 go up a lot. Solar energy companies are doing well too. But some stocks that were popular because of jokes on the internet, like GameStop, are not as popular anymore. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that Nvidia and tech stocks are the main drivers of Nasdaq 100's record high, while ignoring other factors such as the performance of the overall economy, interest rates, inflation, geopolitical tensions, etc. A more accurate headline would be: "Nvidia And Tech Stocks Contribute To Nasdaq 100's Record High; Solar Sector Shines, Meme Stock Bubble Bursts".
2. The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claim that Nvidia and tech stocks are propelling the Nasdaq 100, nor does it explain how they are doing so. It simply assumes that because these stocks have been performing well recently, they must be the main reason for the index's rise, without considering alternative explanations or possible causal mechanisms.
3. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "shines" and "bursts" to describe the performance of different sectors and stocks, without defining what these terms mean or how they are measured. For example, what does it mean for a solar sector to shine? How is this different from simply rising in value? Likewise, how is a meme stock bubble bursting quantified or verified?
4. The article relies heavily on anecdotal and subjective sources, such as Reddit users, analysts, and experts, without providing any credible or verifiable references to support their claims or opinions. This creates a potential bias and conflict of interest, as these sources may have their own agendas or motives for promoting or criticizing certain stocks or sectors.
5. The article does not address the possible consequences or implications of the Nasdaq 100's record high, such as market volatility, valuation risks, regulatory scrutiny, etc. It also does not offer any recommendations or strategies for investors who are interested in taking advantage of or hedging against these trends.
6. The article ends with a blatant advertisement for Benzinga's services and features, which is irrelevant to the topic and may be seen as an attempt to manipulate or influence the readers' decisions or actions by appealing to their emotions or fears.