A company called WeRide that makes cars and robots that can drive themselves without people is trying to raise money by selling shares of its company to investors. They want to do this in the United States, even though they are based in China. They used to be worth a lot of money and had many famous people working for them, but now they are not making as much money as before and are losing money. They hope that by selling shares, they can get more money to keep working on their cars and robots. They also hope that more people will want to use their cars and robots in the future, because they can drive themselves and do not need people to control them. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that WeRide is a failed company or facing imminent collapse.
- The article uses unreliable and outdated data, such as using a $500 million fundraising estimate from March 2023, which is unlikely to be accurate given the current market conditions and WeRide's lowered valuation.
- The article focuses too much on negative aspects, such as falling revenue and widening losses, while downplaying or ignoring the company's achievements, partnerships, and international presence.
- The article uses a sarcastic and dismissive tone, suggesting that the company's star-studded cast is not impressive or valuable, and that the international footprint is not significant.
- The article questionable market analysis and comparisons, such as comparing WeRide to other companies that have already gone public or are planning to do so, without considering their different business models, strategies, and prospects.
- The article relies on unnamed or unverified sources, such as "China Renaissance estimated the IPO might raise just $100 million," which does not provide any credibility or evidence.
- The article does not provide a balanced or objective view of WeRide's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, nor does it offer any constructive criticism or suggestions for improvement.

The key takeaways section is too long and detailed for an image alt text. The image should be replaced with a relevant and concise alt text. The main points should be summarized in the introduction and the conclusion of the article.