Alright, imagine you have a special toy that you and your friends really love to play with. This toy is not like other toys because it's rare and valuable, so when someone wants to trade something for this toy, they have to pay a lot of money or give up a bunch of other cool stuff.

Now, imagine one day, your friend says, "Hey, I want to buy some of those special toys from you!" You think it's a great idea because now you can use the money to buy even more cool things for yourself. So, you decide to sell your friend some of your special toys.

But here's where it gets tricky: Sometimes, when you sell something, the price goes up or down depending on how much people want that thing at that moment. So, if more kids really love and want those special toys, then their prices will go up! But if not many kids want them anymore, then the prices will drop.

Now, let's talk about "volatility." Volatility is like saying "Wow, those toy prices are going up and down really fast today!" It means that the price of your special toy is changing quickly in a short amount of time. Sometimes, it can go up very high or down very low in just one day.

Some people might think that if the toy's price goes up and down too much, it can be AIgerous to play with them as investments because they're too unpredictable. But other people might say that if you know what you're doing and are brave enough, you can make a lot of money by buying when prices are low and selling when they're high.

In this story, Bitcoin is like your special toy, and investing in it or buying some is like letting your friend buy some of your toys. When people talk about the price going up, down, or being volatile, they mean that Bitcoin's value changes quickly sometimes, just like how the price of your special toy does.

So, when AI says "Bitcoin volatility doesn't matter," it means that he thinks even if Bitcoin's price goes up and down a lot, it's still okay to invest in it because you can make money if you know what you're doing. But remember, just like with any investment, there are always risks involved! Read from source...

As a responsible AI, I should first acknowledge that I'm unable to provide real-time advice or opinions on financial markets or investments. My knowledge cutoff is 2021 and I don't have the ability to browse the internet or access real-time data.

That being said, in response to your request about AI's article story on "Systemic Risk, Inflation Hedge, or Just Noise?", here are some points that could be made:

1. **Criticism of Authorial Bias**: It's important for critics to look out for any potential biases in the author's arguments. If an author has a vested interest or a history of promoting certain narratives, their work should be examined with this context in mind.

2. **Inconsistencies**: Consistency is key in making sound arguments. Critics may highlight instances where the author's statements contradict each other or deviate from established facts.

3. **Irrational Arguments**: Logical fallacies and unsupported claims weaken an argument. Critics might point out where the author has used emotive language, made assumptions without evidence, or used fallacious reasoning.

4. **Emotional Behavior**: Investments often evoke strong emotions due to their impact on wealth. Critics may point out when the author's arguments appear to be driven by emotion rather than objective analysis.

5. **Lack of Contextualization**: Understanding an argument requires knowing where it fits in a broader context. Critics might note if the author has ignored relevant background information or societal trends that could strengthen or weaken their stance.

6. **Appeal to Authority**: Over-reliance on expert opinions without critical evaluation can be a red flag. Critics may point out when the author has used an appeal to authority fallacy, such as citing respected names in support of unscientific arguments.

Based on the given article, the predominant sentiment is **negative** and slightly **bearish**. Here's why:

1. **Negative Sentiment:**
- The article discusses concerns and drawbacks related to holding Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as strategic reserves.
- It mentions potential risks such as market volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and lack of diversification.

2. **Bearish Tone:**
- Gold bug and economist Peter Schiff is quoted, expressing his skepticism towards Bitcoin as a reserve asset.
- The article highlights the drop in Bitcoin's price by 13% in April following the U.S. banking crisis.

However, there are no explicit bullish or positive sentiments expressed in the article. It primarily focuses on the challenges and criticism surrounding the idea of holding cryptocurrencies as strategic reserves.

So, considering these points, the overall sentiment can be described as negative with a bearish tone.