Some rich people who can buy a lot of things are watching a company called Uber very closely. They are betting on whether the price of Uber's stock will go up or down. Half of them think it will go up and half of them think it will go down. The important thing is that they all agree that the price of Uber's stock should stay between $30 and $100 in the next three months. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading, as it implies that whales are only interested in UBER, when in fact they may have other investments or strategies. A more accurate title would be "Check Out What Whales Are Doing With Their Money" or something similar.
- The article does not define what a whale is, nor how it differs from a retail investor or an institutional investor. This creates confusion and uncertainty for the reader, who may wonder if they can also be considered a whale based on their trading activity or portfolio size.
- The article uses vague terms like "bullish" and "bearish" without explaining what they mean or how they are measured. A more precise way to describe the investors' expectations would be to use indicators such as implied volatility, delta, gamma, vega, or theta, which quantify the risk and reward of an option trade.
- The article does not provide any evidence or reasoning for why 50% of the whales are bullish and 50% are bearish on UBER. This is a crucial piece of information that would help the reader understand the market sentiment and the potential drivers behind the options activity. For example, the article could mention if there are any positive or negative news, earnings, analyst ratings, or technical signals that influence the whales' decisions.
- The article does not justify how it calculated the projected price targets based on the trading volumes and open interest. This is another important aspect that would help the reader assess the validity and reliability of the information. For example, the article could mention if it used any statistical models, technical analysis, or fundamental analysis to derive the price band and the probability of reaching it.
- The article does not acknowledge the limitations and caveats of using options history as a proxy for whales' behavior. Options are derivatives that give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an underlying asset at a specific price and time. Therefore, they do not necessarily reflect the actual ownership or intention of the investor. For example, some whales may use options as hedges, speculative bets, arbitrage opportunities, or leverage tools, which may not correspond to their long-term views on UBER. Moreover, some whales may trade options through intermediaries, such as funds, trusts, or partnerships, which may obscure their true identity and motives.

The sentiment of this article is mostly bullish with a slight touch of bearishness. The reason for this conclusion is based on the analysis of trades by whales and their implications on Uber Technologies' stock price.

Based on the article and my analysis, I would recommend buying a call option with a strike price of $35 and an expiration date in three months. The reason for this recommendation is that whales have shown a significant interest in UBER options, especially calls, which indicates a bullish outlook on the stock. Moreover, the projected price target range is between $30.0 and $100.0, which means there is a lot of potential upside for this investment.

The risks involved in this recommendation are that UBER may experience a sudden drop in demand due to changes in consumer behavior or competition, or the company may face regulatory hurdles or legal issues that could negatively impact its stock price. Additionally, the call option itself carries the risk of time decay, meaning that if the stock does not reach the strike price before expiration, the option will lose value.