Some companies reported their earnings, which means they shared how much money they made in the last three months. Willis Towers Watson is one of those companies. They made more money than people thought they would, so the people who follow the stock market are happy. The people who work for the company also did a good job, so they are giving more information about how they will make money in the future. Some experts who follow the company are also saying that the company's stock is worth more money now. Read from source...

- AI's take: The article is a mix of facts and opinions, but lacks a clear structure and coherence.
- AI's criticism: The article does not provide a comprehensive overview of Willis Towers Watson's Q2 earnings and the analysts' reactions. It jumps from one topic to another, without explaining the relevance or the connection between them.
- AI's suggestion: The article should be reorganized into sections, with headlines that summarize the main points of each section. For example:
- Q2 earnings summary: where the article should report the key figures and compare them with the analysts' expectations and the previous year's results.
- Analysts' reactions: where the article should quote the main comments from the analysts who raised or lowered their price targets or ratings on Willis Towers Watson, and explain the reasons behind their changes.
- Willis Towers Watson's guidance update: where the article should explain the rationale for raising the low end of the FY24 EPS and adjusted operating margin targets, and how this affects the company's outlook and valuation.
- AI's criticism: The article uses vague and subjective terms to describe the analysts' changes, such as "boosted", "maintained", "increased", "modified", without providing any numbers or percentages. This makes it hard for the readers to understand the magnitude and significance of the changes.
- AI's suggestion: The article should quantify the analysts' changes, using numbers and percentages, as well as charts and graphs, to visualize the trends and comparisons. For example:
- Wells Fargo raised its price target from $318 to $321, a 1% increase.
- Truist Securities maintained its Buy rating, but increased its price target from $310 to $335, a 7.7% increase.
- Roth MKM maintained its Buy rating, but increased its price target from $300 to $315, a 5% increase.

The Analyst Ratings Calendar allows users to view upcoming earnings, dividend increases, IPOs, Splits, and other key events for a given security. This can help users to anticipate volatility and make more informed decisions.