Some companies' shares went down because they had bad news or people think their business might not do well. Others went up because they had good news or people think their business will do better. Read from source...

1. The author begins by stating that "Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) shares are trading lower by 11%". This is a factual statement that could be considered as an introduction to the rest of the article. However, it does not provide any context or explanation for why this is happening, which leaves the reader wondering what is causing such a significant drop in value. A better approach would have been to mention some possible reasons for the decline, such as recent news, earnings reports, or market trends that could be affecting SAIC's performance.
2. The author then proceeds to list several other stocks that are also moving in Monday's mid-day session, without any clear connection to SAIC's situation. This makes it seem like the article is trying to fill space by mentioning random companies, rather than focusing on the main topic of interest for the readers. A more effective way of presenting this information would have been to group the stocks according to their sector, industry, or some other relevant criteria, and then explain how they are related to SAIC's performance or the overall market conditions.
3. The author also uses vague terms like "other stocks" and "moving in Monday's mid-day session" without specifying which ones or how much they are moving. This creates confusion and ambiguity for the reader, who might not know what to make of these references. A better way of writing this section would have been to name the specific stocks and their percentage changes, and to indicate whether they are going up or down in relation to SAIC's performance.
4. The author does not provide any analysis or interpretation of the data presented in the article. He simply lists the names and prices of various companies, without explaining why they are significant or relevant to the topic at hand. This leaves the reader feeling unsatisfied and confused, as they are not given any insight into what these stock movements mean for SAIC's future prospects or the broader market conditions. A more valuable article would have included some commentary on the possible causes and consequences of these changes, as well as some recommendations for investors who might be interested in buying or selling shares of these companies.