Some people did an experiment to see how strong iPhones and other phones are. They dropped them from really high places with drones and saw that the iPhone was better at not breaking when it fell on grass, but the Samsung phone got more damage. The way a phone breaks or doesn't break depends on how it hits something and if it lands flat or in a small space. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there is a mysterious or strange physics behind the iPhone surviving a plane fall but not a kitchen counter, when in reality it has more to do with the impact force and velocity than any weird physical phenomenon. A better title would be something like "How Terminal Velocity and Impact Force Affect Smartphone Durability".
2. The article does not provide enough context or explanation for the concept of terminal velocity. It just mentions it as a factor in the phones' survival, without explaining what it is, how it works, or why it matters. This leaves readers uninformed and confused about this key concept.
3. The article also fails to mention other factors that may influence smartphone durability, such as materials, design, construction, and testing methods. For example, the iPhone 14 Pro Max has a titanium frame that is supposed to make it more resistant to damage, but the drop test in 2023 showed that this feature did not improve its performance compared to previous models. The article should explore these nuances and complications rather than presenting a simplistic and one-sided narrative.
4. The article relies too much on anecdotal evidence and personal opinions, such as the quotes from Rhett Allain and the unnamed YouTuber. These sources may be credible and knowledgeable, but they do not provide any empirical or objective data to support their claims. The article should include more scientific and quantitative information to back up its arguments and show the readers how the experiment was conducted and what were the results and conclusions.