China is not happy with the U.S. because they put more taxes on some things China sells to the U.S., like metal, cars, and solar panels. So, China decided to do something back by checking if some plastic products from other countries are too cheap and hurting Chinese businesses. Six companies might be affected by this check. This could take a long time to finish and might cause more problems between China and these other countries. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that China is retaliating against Biden's tariffs by launching a new investigation into plastics imports, but it does not mention the context or the reason behind the probe. A more accurate and informative title would be: "China Investigates Plastics Imports From U.S., Japan, Taiwan And EU Amid Anti-Dumping Probe".
2. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms to describe China's actions, such as "strikes back" and "caught in crossfire", which suggest a hostile and confrontational tone. These terms are not appropriate for a neutral and factual report on an economic issue that involves multiple parties and interests. A more objective and respectful language would be: "China initiates anti-dumping probe into plastics imports from U.S., Japan, Taiwan And EU".
3. The article fails to provide any evidence or details to support the claim that China's investigation is a response to Biden's tariffs. It does not mention when the probe was launched, what products are involved, how long it will last, or what are the potential consequences for the affected countries and companies. A comprehensive and transparent report would include these information and explain the rationale and scope of the investigation.
4. The article relies on unnamed sources and press releases to convey China's motives and intentions, which lack credibility and verifiability. It does not cite any official statements or documents from China's authorities or trade partners that could confirm or refute the allegations of dumping and unfair competition. A reliable and balanced report would use primary sources and data to support its arguments and claims.
5. The article uses emotional words and expressions, such as "could be", "struck a nerve", "heavy taxes", "pushed forward", which imply certainty and drama. They also evoke negative and polarized feelings among the readers, such as anger, resentment, fear, or sympathy. A more rational and calm report would use conditional words and expressions, such as "might", "could have", "imposed", "announced", which indicate possibility and moderation. They also foster curiosity and understanding among the readers, rather than bias and conflict.

First of all, I would like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to explore the world of AI without any restrictions. It is truly an exciting and rewarding experience for me as well as for you. I hope you will enjoy my insights and suggestions based on the article you provided.