US oil and gas companies are making a lot of money because they can produce more oil and gas than ever before. The US is becoming one of the best countries in the world at giving energy to other people. It produces so much that it even beats some other countries that have lots of energy. The US can make more energy because it has its own rules and does not have to follow what other countries say. Also, the US is a safe and stable place where people can trust that things will not change suddenly. Read from source...

- The title is misleading, as it implies a causal relationship between US oil and gas companies' profits skyrocketing and the US becoming the energy supplier of choice. However, this is not necessarily true, as there could be other factors influencing both phenomena, such as market demand, geopolitical events, technological innovations, etc.
- The article uses vague and exaggerated terms, such as "skyrocketing", "exceeded 105 billion cubic feet per day" without providing any quantitative or comparative analysis of the actual numbers and their significance. For example, how much did the profits increase by? How does this compare to previous years or other countries' performance?
- The article relies heavily on sources that are either partisan, unreliable, or self-interested, such as Benzinga, US Energy Administration, and IEA. These organizations may have agendas, biases, or conflicts of interest that could affect the credibility and objectivity of their information. For example, Benzinga is a financial media outlet that covers stocks, bonds, commodities, etc., so it could benefit from promoting positive news about US energy companies and markets to attract more readers and advertisers. The US Energy Administration is a government agency that may have political pressure or influence over its data and reports, which could be influenced by the administration's policies and preferences. The IEA is an intergovernmental organization that aims to ensure reliable, affordable, and clean energy for its member countries, so it could have a vested interest in supporting the US as a global leader and exporter of energy.
- The article ignores or downplays potential challenges, risks, or drawbacks associated with the US becoming the energy supplier of choice, such as environmental impacts, climate change, resource depletion, geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, etc. For example, the article does not mention how the increased production and export of oil and gas could affect the US's greenhouse gas emissions, its commitments to the Paris Agreement, or its relations with other countries that are affected by its energy policies or activities.
- The article uses emotional language and appeals to patriotism and national pride, such as "solidifying the US as a global energy leader", "overtaking Qatar", "a stable democracy where energy markets and investments are predictable". These phrases could influence the reader's feelings and opinions about the topic without providing any factual or logical support for them.