Alright, buddy! So imagine you have a friend who invented some really smart computers that can help other companies do their work better and faster. These computers use something called "AI" which is like giving them brains to learn and make decisions almost as well as humans.

Now, this friend's company is called C3.ai, and they want more people to know about their super-smart computers (or AI). They've made two new deals:

1. **With a big company called Capgemini**: This deal lets many companies in different fields like hospitals, power plants, banks, and factories use C3.ai's smart computers to make their work easier and cheaper. It's like having a really helpful assistant at your company!

2. **With another huge company named Microsoft**: The two friends promised to help each other spread the word about how cool AI is. They'll come up with new ideas together, and Microsoft will be C3.ai's helper when they work with their computers.

Even though these deals are great news, a funny thing happened: people who own shares in C3.ai (little pieces of the company) thought something wasn't quite right and sold some of those shares. That's why the price of these shares went down by 2%. It's like when you have too many candies and your friend wants to trade one for a toy, so you both agree on a lower candy price.

Anyway, C3.ai is still working hard to make their AI super-smart and help other companies with it. Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some points that could be seen as inconsistent, biased, or potentially illogical:

1. **Inconsistency in Sentiment:**
- The opening sentence states that AI shares are trading lower "despite the positive news" of partnerships.
- However, later, it mentions how these partnerships and moves highlight C3.ai's commitment to expansion, which seems like a positive development.

2. **Bias towards Positive Spin:**
- The article mainly focuses on the positives of the partnerships (expansion, acceleration, growth) with little mention or analysis of potential challenges or downsides.
- Phrases like "strategic moves" and "AI adoption is driven" imply a positive outcome without providing detailed evidence.

3. **Lack of Critical Analysis:**
- The article doesn't delve into the financial implications of these partnerships, nor does it discuss how they might specifically benefit C3.ai or Capgemini's clients.
- There's no discussion on potential risks or hurdles in implementing Enterprise AI solutions across various industries.

4. **Emotional Behavior (of the Market):**
- The article states that AI shares are "trading lower" without providing a clear reason why. While it mentions the partnerships, it doesn't explain why the market might be reacting negatively to what appears to be positive news.
- The phrase "AI shares traded lower by 2% at $32.30 at last check Wednesday" is not followed up with any analysis or context on what this movement signifies.

To make the article more balanced and objective, it could benefit from exploring these potential issues, providing different perspectives, and delving deeper into the details of these partnerships and their potential impacts.

The article is written with a primarily **positive** sentiment. Here are some key points that support this:

1. **Expanded Partnerships**: The company has announced two strategic alliances: one with Capgemini and another with Microsoft. These collaborations aim to accelerate AI solution delivery across various industries.
2. **Global Growth**: Both partnerships indicate a focus on global expansion, with Capgemini's global implementation capabilities and Microsoft as the preferred cloud provider.
3. **Expertise Combination**: The partnerships combine C3.ai's AI applications with the industry expertise of both Capgemini and Microsoft, which is expected to tailor solutions effectively across sectors.

However, there's one point that adds a slightly **negative** tone:

- **Stock Performance**: Despite the positive news, C3.ai shares are trading lower on Wednesday. This might be due to broader market conditions or other factors not immediately discussed in the article.

Overall, while the stock performance is less positive, the strategic partnerships and growth prospects dominate the narrative, making the sentiment of the article predominantly positive.