A lot of people who work with computers and make them smarter talked about their ideas this week. Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of Facebook's parent company, shared his thoughts on a big idea from Sam Altman, who is in charge of another company that makes smart computers. Some other important people also said things about these ideas and companies like Nvidia did very well. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that there are many AI developments this week, when in reality, most of the content focuses on just one company (Nvidia) and its achievements. This creates a false impression of diversity and importance in the AI field.
2. The article fails to provide any context or background information about Sam Altman's chipmaking plan, which makes it hard for readers to understand the significance and scope of his proposal. Instead, it jumps straight into Zuckerberg's opinion without explaining what the plan is or why it matters.
3. The article presents Zuckerberg's comments as if they were authoritative or definitive, when in fact, he has no direct experience or expertise in chipmaking or AI research. His views are based on his personal interest and competition with OpenAI, not on objective analysis or evidence.
4. The article does not mention any other perspectives or counterarguments to Zuckerberg's opinion, which creates a biased and one-sided representation of the issue. It also ignores the potential benefits and challenges of Altman's plan for both society and the tech industry.
5. The article introduces CNBC's Jim Cramer as an authority on AI, even though he is a stock market analyst who has no formal education or training in computer science or artificial intelligence. His opinion on Nvidia's success is irrelevant and uninformed, yet it is given equal weight to other sources of information.
6. The article uses emotional language and exaggeration to describe Nvidia's achievements, such as "record-breaking" and "hit record highs". This makes the company seem more impressive and successful than it actually is, while downplaying the contributions and challenges of other players in the AI field.
7. The article briefly mentions Elon Musk's criticism of Google's AI, but does not explain why he is concerned or what his alternative approach is. This creates a vague and incomplete picture of the current state and future directions of artificial intelligence research and development.