Imagine you have a giant hamburger company that gives you a small piece of money every three months just for owning a small part of the company. This money is called a dividend. If you want to make $500 every month just from these small pieces of money, you need to own a big enough part of the company.

For McDonald's, the small piece of money is $1.67 every three months, or $6.68 every year. So, if you want to make $500 every month, you need to own enough parts of the company to get $6.68 every three months.

To figure out how many parts you need, you can divide $500 by $6.68, which is like asking, "How many small pieces of money do I need to make $500?" This will tell you how many parts of the company you need to own.

So, $500 divided by $6.68 is about 75. That means you need to own 75 parts of the company to make $500 every month just from the small pieces of money. If you want to make less money, like $100 every month, you can divide $100 by $6.68, which is about 15 parts. That means you only need to own 15 parts of the company to make $100 every month.

But remember, the small pieces of money can change over time. If the company does better and gives out more money, the small pieces of money will get bigger, and you can make more money every month. If the company does worse and gives out less money, the small pieces of money will get smaller, and you can make less money every month. So, you need to keep an eye on how the company is doing. Read from source...

- The article has no data or analysis to support its claims, only vague references to "potential gains" and "recent buzz".
- The article uses confusing and misleading terms, such as "dividend yield", "rolling basis", "dividend payment", "stock price", etc. without explaining them or providing context.
- The article makes unrealistic and arbitrary assumptions, such as dividing the desired annual income by the dividend, without considering other factors, such as inflation, taxes, fees, etc.
- The article relies on outdated and irrelevant information, such as the Q2 earnings date, which has already passed, and the stock price, which is not related to the dividend income.
- The article has no references, sources, or citations to support its claims or credibility.
- The article has no purpose or audience, other than to generate clicks and ad revenue.

### Final answer: The article is a poorly written, misleading, and unreliable piece of content, that should not be trusted or used for any investment decisions.