Apple is a big company that makes phones, computers and other things. Sometimes they try to make new stuff, but it doesn't always work out. They tried to make a car and a special screen, but they stopped those projects because they couldn't do them well enough. Then, Apple had to let go of some people who worked on those projects, about 600 of them in California. Read from source...

- The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Apple killed two major projects (car and display) and then proceeded to lay off a large number of employees (600). However, the article does not provide any evidence or details on how these events are causally related or happened sequentially. A more accurate headline would be: "Apple Lays Off 600 Employees After Halting Car and Display Projects".
- The article lacks objectivity and balance. It relies heavily on unnamed sources, especially Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who has a history of leaking information about Apple's internal matters. The article does not present any counterarguments or alternative perspectives from Apple itself or other experts. This creates a biased and one-sided impression of the situation.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms to describe the projects that Apple killed. For example, it says that Apple "halted" its self-driving car initiative, but does not explain why, how, or when this decision was made. It also says that Apple had a "next-generation display program", but does not specify what kind of display technology or application it was working on. This leaves the reader with many unanswered questions and assumptions.
- The article emphasizes the negative aspects of the layoffs, such as the number of employees affected (600), the locations (California), and the timing (third round of layoffs this year). However, it does not provide any context or background information on why Apple needed to reduce its workforce, how it handled the transition for the laid-off employees, or what impact these layoffs had on its business performance or innovation capacity. This creates a negative and pessimistic tone that does not acknowledge any potential benefits or opportunities for Apple from its strategic changes.