So, there are some people who think that a company called Autodesk is going to do well in the future. They are saying this by giving it different ratings and numbers. Some say it will be worth $265 or $300 soon. These people use something called options to make money from their ideas. Options are like bets on how much a company's stock will change, but they can lose money too if they guess wrong. There is also a website that helps these people know when other people are making big options bets on Autodesk. The article talks about all of this and more. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and vague. It does not provide a clear idea of what the article is about or what the big picture is. A better title could be something like "Analyst Ratings on Autodesk: A Comparison and Evaluation".
- The article jumps from one analyst to another without providing any context, background, or reasoning for their opinions. It does not explain why these analysts are credible, what methods they use, or how their ratings affect the market or investors. This makes it hard to follow and understand the main point of the article.
- The article uses technical terms like "options activity", "price target", and "strike price" without defining them or explaining how they work. This assumes that the reader already knows these concepts, which may not be true for many readers who are new to options trading or Autodesk as a company. A glossary or an introduction section could help with this issue.
- The article mentions Benzinga Pro as a source of real-time options trades alerts, but does not disclose any affiliation or partnership with the company. This may raise questions about the objectivity and credibility of the article, as well as the author's intentions for promoting this service. A disclosure statement or a clear separation between news and advertising could improve the transparency and trustworthiness of the article.
- The article ends with a long list of links to other channels, tools, features, partners, and sponsored content from Benzinga. This clutters the page and distracts the reader from the main topic of the article. It also creates confusion about what is part of the article and what is not, as some of these links lead to external sites that are not related to Autodesk or options trading. A more concise and focused conclusion could help with this issue.