Walmart and Amazon are big companies that sell things to people. They both want to make more money, so they are trying to sell ads to other businesses. Ads are like pictures or videos that tell people about a product. Walmart is doing well because it can sell things to different types of people, even if they don't have a lot of money. Both Walmart and Amazon are also letting other companies sell their stuff on their websites, which helps them make more money too. Read from source...

- The article does not provide a clear definition or explanation of Walmart's advertising growth strategy, nor how it differs from Amazon's ad unit. It simply compares the two without delving into the details and nuances of each platform. This lack of depth and analysis leaves the reader uninformed and confused about the actual value proposition of Walmart's ad business.
- The article uses vague terms such as "appealing to families across different income levels" and "diversifying its business". These phrases are too broad and generic, they do not capture the specific aspects or factors that make Walmart's strategy successful or unique. They also imply a positive bias towards Walmart, without providing any evidence or data to support such claims.
- The article makes a flawed comparison between Walmart and Amazon, by focusing only on their ad sales and ignoring other important revenue streams and aspects of their business models. For example, the article does not mention how Walmart's third-party marketplace expansion affects its relationship with suppliers, retailers, and consumers, or how it impacts competition and innovation in the e-commerce sector. Similarly, the article does not address how Walmart+ compares to Amazon Prime in terms of membership benefits, pricing, and customer satisfaction.
- The article is overly emotional and sensationalist, by using phrases such as "Walmart has a good reason to be excited", "weathered macroeconomic challenges far better than most of their peers", and "undoubtedly". These statements are not backed up by any facts or figures, they only aim to persuade the reader to have a positive opinion about Walmart's performance and prospects. They also imply a lack of objectivity and impartiality from the author, who seems to be biased towards Walmart and its growth story.