Key points:
1. A fake tweet from SEC made people think bitcoin ETF was approved, so prices went up.
2. The SEC said it was a hack and the tweet was not true.
3. A crypto expert saw a sell signal on the BTC chart and warned of possible price drops. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that the SEC approved a spot Bitcoin ETF when in fact it was just a fake tweet from a compromised account. This creates unnecessary fear and excitement among investors and manipulates their expectations.
2. The article uses vague terms like "fake news" and "official SEC account" without providing any evidence or source for the claim. This undermines the credibility of the author and the publication, as well as creates confusion and mistrust among readers.
3. The article does not provide any context or background information about the history of Bitcoin ETFs and why they have been rejected by the SEC in the past. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the significance and implications of the fake tweet, as well as the potential consequences for the cryptocurrency market.
4. The article focuses too much on the short-term price movements and liquidations of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin, without considering the long-term trends and fundamentals of these digital assets. This gives a biased and superficial view of the market, as well as ignores the possible reasons for the fake tweet's impact on the sentiment and behavior of investors.
5. The article quotes an analyst named Ali Martinez, who claims that the TD Sequential is flashing a sell signal on the BTC weekly chart. However, the author does not explain what this technical indicator is, how it works, or why it is relevant for the cryptocurrency market. This makes it hard for readers to assess the validity and usefulness of Martinez's analysis, as well as his credibility and expertise in the field.