A company called OpenAI made a smart computer program that can help people learn things. Some people were worried that this program could be used to make AIgerous germs or viruses. So, OpenAI tested their program with some biology experts and students. They found out that the program did not really help much in making bad germs. The company is still trying to see if their program can do other harmful things like causing computer problems or changing what people think. Read from source...

- The article is based on a study that involved only 100 participants (50 experts and 50 students) which is a very small sample size for such a sensitive topic. This makes the results unreliable and not representative of the whole population.
- The article uses sensationalist language to describe the potential AIgers of GPT-4, such as "limited utility", "minimal propensity", and "slight uptick". These words imply that GPT-4 is not a serious threat at all, which contradicts the findings of other studies that have shown more alarming outcomes.
- The article does not provide any evidence or examples to support its claims that GPT-4 can be used for bioweapon development. It merely states what OpenAI's researchers said without questioning their methods, assumptions, or limitations. This makes the article one-sided and uninformative.
- The article fails to mention any of the positive aspects of GPT-4, such as its ability to assist in medical research, drug discovery, environmental conservation, or education. It only focuses on the negative implications, which creates a biased and negative tone.