NEAR Protocol is a type of digital money that people can use to buy and sell things online. It's value goes up and down sometimes, and in the past 24 hours it went up by more than 4%. This makes some people happy because they think it's worth more now than before. But other people might not care or agree with this idea. The price of NEAR Protocol has been changing over time, but it is still far from its highest point ever. Some people like to trade NEAR Protocol and watch how much it costs every day and week, using special tools called Bollinger Bands that help them see when the price moves a lot or not so much. Read from source...

- The article is poorly written and lacks clarity in its main points and purpose. It seems to be a generic copy-paste of some press release or other sources without adding any value or analysis.
- The article does not provide any context or background information about NEAR Protocol, its features, benefits, challenges, or competitive advantages. It assumes the reader already knows what it is and why it matters. This shows a lack of research and understanding of the topic and the target audience.
- The article uses vague and misleading terms such as "price rose", "positive trend", and "all-time high" without defining or comparing them to any relevant benchmarks, indicators, or standards. It also does not explain how these terms are calculated or measured, or what they mean for the investors or users of NEAR Protocol. This creates confusion and uncertainty among the readers and undermines the credibility of the article.
- The article includes a chart that is supposed to illustrate the price movement and volatility of NEAR Protocol, but it does not explain how to interpret it, what it represents, or why it matters. It also uses Bollinger Bands, which are commonly used to identify overbought and oversold conditions in the market, but does not mention them or their significance. This makes the chart useless and irrelevant for the readers who may not be familiar with these concepts or tools.
- The article ends abruptly without a conclusion, summary, or call to action. It leaves the reader hanging and wondering what the purpose of the article was in the first place. It also does not provide any sources or references for the information presented in the article, which makes it hard to verify its accuracy and reliability.