A long time ago, people made cars by hand. But now, machines and computers can make cars faster and better. This is called automation. Some car companies had to pay their workers more money because of a deal they made with the union. To save money, these companies want to use more machines and less workers to make cars. This could be bad for the workers in the future. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that automation will definitely increase after the UAW deal costs the car industry, but it does not provide any evidence or analysis to support this claim. It also suggests a causal relationship between the UAW deal and automation, without considering other factors that might influence the adoption of automation in the car industry.
2. The article uses vague terms like "deeper investment in automation" and "big automation program", without defining what they mean or providing any numbers or examples to illustrate them. It also does not specify how much automation is already present in the car industry, or how much it could potentially increase.
3. The article presents the UAW wage increases as a problem for the car industry, without acknowledging the benefits of higher wages for workers, such as improved working conditions, job security, and consumer demand. It also does not mention any other factors that might affect labor costs, such as productivity, efficiency, or innovation.
4. The article relies on Ford's disclosure of the labor deal cost as a source of information, without verifying its accuracy or reliability. It also does not provide any context or comparison for this figure, such as how it relates to other automakers, other industries, or historical trends.
5. The article uses emotional language and phrases, such as "this could prove to be a longer-term negative", "we have our work cut out for us", and "the digital age descends on the car industry", without providing any objective evidence or analysis to back them up. It also implies that automation is inevitable and unstoppable, without considering the potential drawbacks, risks, or alternatives.
6. The article ends with an incomplete sentence, which suggests a lack of professionalism and attention to detail.

1. Robotics and artificial intelligence firms (e.g., NVIDIA, Amazon Web Services, Alphabet's Google Cloud AI, Microsoft Azure AI, IBM Watson): These companies are likely to benefit from the increased demand for automation in the car industry due to rising labor costs. They provide hardware, software, and services that enable autonomous driving, smart manufacturing, and AI-powered solutions for various industries. The potential return on investment could be significant, but there are also risks involved, such as intense competition, regulatory uncertainties, technological challenges, and market fluctuations.
2. Electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers and suppliers (e.g., Tesla, Rivian, NIO, Lucid Motors, CATL, BYD): These companies are also well-positioned to benefit from the growing trend of automation in the car industry, as they develop and produce EVs that can leverage advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), robotics, and AI technologies. The demand for EVs is expected to increase rapidly due to rising environmental concerns, government incentives, and consumer preferences. However, there are also risks associated with investing in this sector, such as high research and development costs, manufacturing bottlenecks, supply chain disruptions, battery technology limitations, and fierce competition from established players and new entrants.