Google and Adobe made computer programs that can create pictures and stories. But sometimes, these programs make mistakes and show people in the wrong way or say things that are not true. This makes some people unhappy because they want these programs to be better at understanding all kinds of people and history. The bosses of Google and Adobe said they will try to fix this problem. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that both Google's Gemini and Adobe's Firefly are equally problematic on race issues when generating AI art. However, the article does not provide any clear evidence or comparison of how these two systems fail on different aspects or to what extent.
- The article uses terms like "trips up", "backlash", "inadvertently off base", "perpetuating harmful stereotypes" without providing any concrete examples or data to support these claims. It relies heavily on quotes from Adobe and Google representatives, who are likely biased and have a vested interest in defending their products and avoiding further criticism.
- The article fails to acknowledge the limitations and challenges of current AI models for generating realistic and historically accurate images and texts, especially when dealing with complex and sensitive topics like race, history, culture, etc. It also does not mention any potential solutions or best practices that could be adopted by these companies or the research community to improve the quality and diversity of their AI outputs.
- The article introduces irrelevant information about the controversy surrounding Google's Gemini and the possible political influence on its development, without explaining how this is related to the main topic of the article, which is about race issues in AI art generation. This could be seen as an attempt to create a false connection or association between unrelated events, or to appeal to emotions and bias of the readers.
- The article ends with a disclaimer that states that it was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed, without disclosing what kind of neurotechnology or AI system was used, how it affected the content, or who reviewed it. This could raise questions about the credibility and transparency of the article and its sources.

Negative

Key points and summarization:
- Google's Gemini AI chatbot also had issues with race and historical accuracy
- Adobe's Firefly AI model has generated inaccurate images of historical figures
- Both companies are facing backlash for their AI models not being able to accurately represent diverse identities
- Tech companies face challenges in developing AI tools that avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes and don't rely on White House influence