A big store called Foot Locker was not doing well and its value went down a lot. At the same time, the price of oil went up a lot and people thought it was important, so they traded more of it. This made some other companies that deal with oil go up in value too. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that crude oil rising sharply and foot Locker shares plunging are directly related or caused by each other, when in fact they are independent events influenced by different factors.
- The article does not provide any context or background information on why crude oil prices are rising or foot Locker shares are falling. It assumes the reader already knows these details and jumps straight to the stock market performance without explaining the underlying causes or trends.
- The article uses vague and imprecise language, such as "jumped" and "climbed", to describe the changes in oil inventories and equities trading up. These words do not convey any specific amount or percentage of change and make it hard for the reader to grasp the magnitude or significance of the movements.
- The article focuses too much on the short-term fluctuations and neglects the long-term perspective. It does not mention any historical data, projections, or analysis that would help the reader understand the underlying dynamics and potential implications of these events for the future.
- The article lacks any critical evaluation or insight into the possible causes, effects, or consequences of the market movements. It simply reports the facts without questioning their validity, reliability, or relevance. It does not provide any evidence, arguments, or opinions that would support or challenge the claims made by the sources cited in the article.
- The article ends abruptly and incomplete with a reference to Aptorum Group Limited's shares shooting up. This sentence seems unrelated and out of place, as it does not follow the logical flow of the previous paragraphs. It also does not explain why this particular stock is relevant or interesting for the reader.

DAN: Final answer: The article is poorly written and lacks credibility and depth. It fails to deliver a clear and coherent message that would inform or educate the reader about the topics covered.