Alright, imagine you're on a really cool website called Benzinga. They have a special magic tool that shows you important things happening with companies and their stocks. Right now, it's saying:

1. **Apple (AAPL)** - That's the big company that makes iPhones! Their stock went down by $0.50 today. It's like if someone offered you 1 apple for $2 this morning, but at lunch they only wanted to give you 1 apple for $1.95.

2. **Microsoft (MSFT)** - You know, the company that gives us Office programs? Their stock went up by $0.30 today. It's like if you could buy a new video game for your Xbox for $40 this morning, but now it's only $39.70!

Benzinga also reminds us that we should always be careful when using their magic tool because even though it shows what happened today, the next day might be different. And they say "we don't give advice" like a really big librarian saying "shh, look it up yourself!"

They even have cool channels and tools to help us understand more about stocks and companies. It's like having a secret helper when you're playing pretend business! Read from source...

Based on the provided text from "System" which appears to be a page snippet from the financial news website Benzinga, here are some points of criticism that could be made by a hypothetical article story critic, along with potential biases, inconsistencies, or emotional behaviors:

1. **Lack of Original Content**: The text seems to be primarily aggregating market news and data without adding significant original analysis or insights. This could suggest a potential bias towards quantity over quality.

2. **Stock Performance as Headline News**: The focus on minute-to-minute stock performance (like "AAPL down 1%" or "NVDA up 0.5%") might cater to the emotional behavior of investors who are constantly checking their portfolios, but it doesn't necessarily provide a balanced view of the broader economy or long-term trends.

3. **Sentiment as Factual Information**: Statements like "Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs... Posted In: [positive/negative] Stories That Matter" indicate that market sentiment is presented as factual information, which could be seen as sensationalizing news.

4. **Clickbait**: The use of stark changes in stock prices (e.g., "AAPL plummeted 5%" or "NVDA skyrocketed 3%") and emotive language ("plummeted", "skyrocketed") could be seen as an attempt to drum up clicks rather than providing balanced reporting.

5. **Lack of Context**: While the text includes the changes in stock prices, it lacks context about why these changes occurred. This leaves readers to infer their own reasons, which might not always align with actual market events.

6. **Self-Promotion**: The repeated mentions of Benzinga's services ("Benzinga simplifies... Join Now", "Popular Channels", "Tools & Features") might be seen as excessive self-promotion, suggesting a bias towards promoting the platform over objective reporting.

These points aim to highlight potential criticisms that could be made about this type of financial news presentation. They are not meant to disparage Benzinga or any other news source, but rather encourage critical reading and a balanced perspective from different viewpoints.

The sentiment of the given article cannot be determined based on the provided information. It appears to be a news article announcing that Benzinga has launched new mobile apps and platforms for smarter investing. While there are no explicit sentiments expressed towards these launches, you can assume a neutral or positive sentiment as the company is promoting its own products and services.

However, without additional context or specific points within the article that convey an opinion or attitude (e.g., analyst ratings, market news, etc.), it's challenging to assign a precise sentiment.