This article talks about how Apple, a big company that makes phones and computers, was losing a lot of money in the 1990s. Steve Jobs, who started Apple and made many cool things, came back to help fix the problems. He used three simple strategies to save Apple from going out of business:

1. Cut costs: This means spending less money on things that are not very important for making good products. By doing this, Apple could keep more money to grow and improve.
2. Focus on quality: Steve Jobs wanted to make sure that every product Apple made was really good and people would love it. He did not want to make many different things just to make money; he wanted to make a few great things that everyone would want to buy.
3. Make new products: Steve Jobs also created new and exciting things like the iPhone, iPod, and iPad that made Apple popular again and helped it earn more money.

By using these three strategies, Steve Jobs saved Apple from going bankrupt and made it one of the most successful companies in the world. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Steve Jobs single-handedly saved Apple from bankruptcy with three simple strategies, when in reality, it was a collective effort of many people at Apple who worked hard to turn things around.
2. The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claim that these three strategies were the main reasons for Apple's success. It would be more informative and credible if the author provided some statistics, case studies, or quotes from relevant sources to back up their arguments.
3. The article seems to focus too much on Steve Jobs and his role in Apple's revival, while ignoring the contributions of other key players such as Tim Cook, Jony Ive, Phil Schiller, etc. This creates a biased and incomplete narrative that does not reflect the true nature of innovation and collaboration at Apple.
4. The article also fails to mention some of the challenges and setbacks that Apple faced during this period, such as the failed Newton project, the powerPC transition, or the antitrust lawsuit. These events could have derailed Apple's comeback if it were not for Steve Jobs' leadership and vision.
5. The article ends with a promotional link to subscribe to Benzinga Tech Trends newsletter, which seems irrelevant and opportunistic given the context of the story. It also does not add any value or insight to the readers who are interested in learning more about Apple's history and strategy.

There are many factors that can affect Apple's stock performance, such as product launches, market trends, competition, regulations, etc. However, based on the article, three simple strategies that Steve Jobs used to save Cupertino from bankruptcy were:

1. Focus on innovation and quality products: Jobs believed that by creating revolutionary products that solved real problems for customers, Apple could differentiate itself from competitors and create loyal fan base. He invested in research and development, hired top talent, and challenged the status quo to come up with new ideas.
2. Cut costs and streamline operations: Jobs realized that Apple was spending too much on marketing, R&D, and other expenses, which were eroding its profit margins. He implemented a cost-cutting program that reduced overhead, renegotiated contracts, and eliminated unprofitable projects. He also outsourced some manufacturing to reduce inventory costs and improve efficiency.
3. Revive the brand image and culture: Jobs wanted Apple to be more than just a hardware company, but a lifestyle brand that represented creativity, passion, and innovation. He redesigned the logo, stores, packaging, and advertising campaigns to reflect Apple's identity and values. He also fostered a culture of collaboration, accountability, and excellence among employees and partners.

Based on these strategies, I would recommend that investors consider buying AAPL stock as a long-term play, given its potential for growth, innovation, and brand loyalty. However, they should also be aware of the risks involved, such as market volatility, competition, regulatory changes, etc., and diversify their portfolio accordingly. Additionally, investors should monitor the company's financial performance, product pipeline, and customer feedback to make informed decisions.