So, there is this guy named Edward Snowden who used to work for the CIA, but he told some secret information and now he can't go back to his home country, America. He lives in Russia instead. Now, he is supporting another person named Roman Storm, who helped make a computer program that lets people send money without anyone knowing who they are. But the government thinks this program is bad because some bad people use it too. So now, Roman Storm needs money to help him with his legal problems, and Edward Snowden wants people to give him money so he can have a good lawyer to protect his privacy rights. He says that everyone should be able to keep their secrets without getting in trouble. Read from source...

1. Snowden's endorsement of Storm's legal defense fund is based on a false assumption that privacy is not a crime, while in reality, it depends on the context and circumstances of each case. Privacy can be a legitimate right or a criminal activity depending on how it is used and for what purpose.
2. The article fails to mention that Tornado Cash was sanctioned by the OFAC due to its involvement in money laundering activities, which is a serious crime that harms society and undermines the integrity of the financial system. The fact that some criminals used Tornado Cash does not mean that the service itself is innocent or deserving of support from whistleblowers like Snowden.
3. The article also ignores the fact that Storm and his colleagues were charged with money laundering, which is a serious allegation that requires evidence and due process to prove their guilt or innocence. By portraying them as victims of persecution, the article biases its readers against the U.S. government and the justice system, without providing any counterarguments or alternative perspectives.
4. The article exaggerates the potential implications of Storm's and Pertsev's arrests for open-source software creation, suggesting that they could have a chilling effect on innovation and creativity in the industry. However, this argument is not supported by any facts or evidence, and it ignores the possibility that other developers might be deterred from engaging in illegal activities or contributing to services that facilitate them.
5. The article appeals to emotions by highlighting Snowden's status as a whistleblower and his personal experience of living in exile, implying that he has a unique understanding of the importance of privacy and the AIgers of government overreach. However, this is not relevant to Storm's case or Tornado Cash's activities, and it does not address the legal or ethical issues involved.